Cambridge City Centre Partnership Board

Thursday, November 20th, 2008. 1:34pm

Parkside Cambridge
A new “City Centre Partnership Board” is being formed help run the historic core of Cambridge City Centre.

Cambridge City Council’s Strategy and Resources Scrutiny committee meeting on Monday 17th November decided to appoint the Executive Councillor for Customer Services and Resources, currently Cllr Cantrill as a director of the new board.

Emma Thornton, Head of Tourism and City Centre Management updated councillors on progress towards establishing this new group which will take on City Centre Management from April 2009. The new board will also eventually take on responsibility for promoting tourism.

Cambridge’s South, West and East Area Committees, but not the North were consulted on the plans. I cannot see why residents and councillors from the North of the City should not have a say in how the city centre is run. It has been reported that the chair of the North Area Committee declined the invitation to participate in the consultation. Councillors at the East Area Committee stressed the importance of the new partnership considering Mill Road.

Cllr Herbert asked Emma Thornton for details of the proposed make-up of the new board. She was not able to reply and instead of answering the question just read out a couple of irrelevant sentences from her report saying:

The City Centre Management team, with the support of local solicitors Hewitsons, are in the advanced stages of drawing up the Memorandum and Articles for the new organisation. These are the legal documents which are required to set up the new partnership as a company limited by guarantee.

Cllr Herbert said he had heard the plan was for the directors to consist of just the one City Councillor, ten retailers, a Cambridge University representative and a representative of the Colleges of the University of Cambridge, and was concerned this would not provide a balanced view. (Surely the University would be expected to represent the colleges’ interests, and what about the other University!) Cllr Cantrill questioned where Cllr Herbert was getting his numbers from; hardly a robust riposte as it was Cllr Cantrill who ought to have been able to provide a definitive answer as to the proposed make up of the board. Previous discussions (September 07, July 08) suggested two City Councillors and an officer, at director level, on behalf of the County Council. Cllr Herbert asked about Community Representation. I was impressed by Emma Thornton’s reply to this, she said: “I see councillors as community representatives”, that’s a sentiment I support wholeheartedly. Cllr Herbert expressed concern that we were ceeding responsibility to large national retail companies.

Emma Thornton went into a bit more detail, describing a structure whereby any companies with an interest in the city centre would be able to become “members” of the new board, and as such would get a vote on a one member, one vote basis. In terms of directors of the partnership board it had been decided that an (as yet unidentified) independent retailer would chair the board and that there would be only one representative of the large national retailers and only one representative of the large shopping centres, despite the officer said, as we now have three in the City Centre.

The meeting’s chair, Cllr Taylor asked Cllr Herbert who he would like to see as a director representing the community. Cllr Herbert said there was a wealth of expertise and plenty of interested people, one way their skills could be harnessed he suggested was by involving residents associations. Cllr Cantrill, while supportive of the role of residents associations cautioned that different associations in the city have very different aims, and were not representative of all residents. I strongly agree with this statement and have been complaining about the excessive weight the city council places on representations from such organisations.

Cllr Bick asked how ward councillors would be able to have an input. Cllr Cantrill replied that the council’s representation would be via him, or the holder of his office. Seeing Cllr Bick wasn’t going to be happy with that response he added he would: “explore ways in which ward councillors can participate in sessions where members interface with the board”.

Emma Thornton then appeared to remember another proposed director of the new board, a representative of the “professional services sector” in the city. She said the solicitors Hewitsons, who were drawing up the group’s founding documents were to be appointed as a representative of this group. There appeared to me to be a potential conflict of interest here particularly as Emma Thornton had said Hewitsons were performing the legal work for a very reasonable rate, perhaps they are being rewarded with a directorship of the new board?

The activities of the board will be funded in the same way as city centre management activities are currently funded. The majority of the money comes from retailers and landlords in the City Centre. Funders include Prudential, Goodmans, Cambridgeshire County Council, Land Securities, Stagecoach, the University Bursar’s Committee, John Lewis, Boots, and Marks & Spencer. The City Council provides about 15% of the cash funding but also provides institutional support including office space.

The hope is that releasing city centre management from the council will encourage even more private investment and improve the speed of decision making resulting from the release from local government bureaucracy.

I did not feel councillors had enough information on the proposed structure of the new board, particularly with respect to who was going to make up its board of directors to properly discuss this item. I think the concern that this new structure could reduce city residents’ ability to influence, via their elected representatives, how the city centre is managed is a real one.

The council are looking for a more catchy new name for the organisation rather than “City Centre Partnership Board”.

4 comments/updates on “Cambridge City Centre Partnership Board

  1. Richard Article author

    I have learnt that there will now be a seat on the board for an someone who can represent resident’s interests and that the prospective Chair of the Cambridge City Centre Partnership Board is Ian Sandison.

    At the 17th November Strategy and Resources Scrutiny meeting councillors were told the chair of the new city centre partnership board would be an “independent retailer”. Looking up “Ian Sandison”, there appears to be only one and he’s in the medical device sales and sales person recruitment business. Not the kind of business which first comes to mind when a city centre independent retailer is mentioned. Perhaps he has an interest in a retail business? (I realise quick online research has its limitations)

    Without being pessimistic, it will be interesting to see the details of how this organisation is structured, as one day the chances are it will have to be dissolved and it might well hold public money / money intended for the public good; it would be wrong to see that distributed among the members.

  2. Richard Article author

    Mr Sandison has replied to me, letting me know some more about his background, and he appears well qualified for the role.

    . I do as you state have various business interests and these include business consultancy and medical device recruitment.

    I also have a retail interest as well, My wife and I have a shop on King Street, Boudoir Femme Ltd, we have been trading their since July 2006, I have also established and chair a very active King Street Traders Association, this has resulted in a number of improvements to the street including Xmas lights for the first time in 2007 and these have been improved upon this year also. I have been an active member of a City Centre Management committee this year which put together the Cambridge at Xmas programme, including the parade and Xmas lights events and I have been an attendee at the Cambridge Retail and Commercial Group CRACA over the past year.
    I am also a resident of Cambridge. living just of Mill Road thus I am able to represent this view also.

    It would have been good if that kind of “biography” statement had been reported to councillors.

  3. Jim Johnson

    Congratulations are due to Boudoir Femme for winning two awards in the inaugural Love Cambridge Charter Awards on Tuesday night.

    Obviously it is a coincidence its owner (with his wife) is Ian Sandison, chairman of Love Cambridge.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.
Please consider saying where you are from eg. "Cambridge".
Required fields are marked *


Powered by WP Hashcash