<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Damming Report on Cambridge Folk Festival Fiasco</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rtaylor.co.uk/damming-report-on-cambridge-folk-festival-fiasco.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rtaylor.co.uk/damming-report-on-cambridge-folk-festival-fiasco.html</link>
	<description>Cambridge, United Kingdom.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.rtaylor.co.uk/damming-report-on-cambridge-folk-festival-fiasco.html#comment-8355</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rtaylor.co.uk/?p=938#comment-8355</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.rtaylor.co.uk/looking-into-the-folk-festival-mistakes.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;My article on the Civic Affairs Committee meeting which considered the report is available via this link.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.rtaylor.co.uk/looking-into-the-folk-festival-mistakes.html" rel="nofollow">My article on the Civic Affairs Committee meeting which considered the report is available via this link.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.rtaylor.co.uk/damming-report-on-cambridge-folk-festival-fiasco.html#comment-7241</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 03:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rtaylor.co.uk/?p=938#comment-7241</guid>
		<description>It has been pointed out to me that: "issue a statement before the Civic Affairs committee considers the report on Monday" doesn't necessarily mean she will attend that meeting and make her statement to it in person. 

She might issue a statement via the council's website or she could have a written statement distributed at Monday's meeting. 

I think it would be quite shocking if she didn't attend Monday's meeting in person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been pointed out to me that: &#8220;issue a statement before the Civic Affairs committee considers the report on Monday&#8221; doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean she will attend that meeting and make her statement to it in person. </p>
<p>She might issue a statement via the council&#8217;s website or she could have a written statement distributed at Monday&#8217;s meeting. </p>
<p>I think it would be quite shocking if she didn&#8217;t attend Monday&#8217;s meeting in person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.rtaylor.co.uk/damming-report-on-cambridge-folk-festival-fiasco.html#comment-7219</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rtaylor.co.uk/?p=938#comment-7219</guid>
		<description>Cllr Julie Smith has &lt;a href="http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/cn_news_cambridge/DisplayArticle.asp?ID=402826" rel="nofollow"&gt;promised to make a statement to the committee receiving this report on Monday 30th March&lt;/a&gt; in the Guildhall. Like all council meetings it will be in public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cllr Julie Smith has <a href="http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/cn_news_cambridge/DisplayArticle.asp?ID=402826" rel="nofollow">promised to make a statement to the committee receiving this report on Monday 30th March</a> in the Guildhall. Like all council meetings it will be in public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Stanton</title>
		<link>http://www.rtaylor.co.uk/damming-report-on-cambridge-folk-festival-fiasco.html#comment-7137</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Stanton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rtaylor.co.uk/?p=938#comment-7137</guid>
		<description>It is truly appalling. 

The tendering process may have been a contributing factor - you pay peanuts... But to have waited so long, not carried out a thorough independent investigation is arrogance on a huge scale. We are no better informed for this years' Folk Festival. For which I guess the whole process has just started again... Goodness alone knows where the shortfall will be made up from.

If it was a business, people would have been disciplined, if the company hadn't folded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is truly appalling. </p>
<p>The tendering process may have been a contributing factor - you pay peanuts&#8230; But to have waited so long, not carried out a thorough independent investigation is arrogance on a huge scale. We are no better informed for this years&#8217; Folk Festival. For which I guess the whole process has just started again&#8230; Goodness alone knows where the shortfall will be made up from.</p>
<p>If it was a business, people would have been disciplined, if the company hadn&#8217;t folded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.rtaylor.co.uk/damming-report-on-cambridge-folk-festival-fiasco.html#comment-7126</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rtaylor.co.uk/?p=938#comment-7126</guid>
		<description>Conservative &lt;a href="http://cherryhintonroad.blogspot.com/2009/03/folk-festival-report-is-truly-shocking.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Cllr Chris Howell has just published his response to the report&lt;/a&gt;; he describes it as "truly shocking". 

He draws attention to the fact that prior to the investigation the council had not properly calculated how much it was owed by the ticket selling company. The council's losses have been determined to be £644,951, not the £618,000 originally quoted. 

He says Cllr Julie Smith, the Executive Councillor responsible, could be described as asleep on the job. 

Attention is also drawn to the recent &lt;a href="http://www.cambridge.gov.uk/ccm/content/strategy-and-partnerships/policy-officer/comprehensive-performance-assessment.en" rel="nofollow"&gt;Audit Commission's statement on Cambridge City Council&lt;/a&gt;:
"Financial management is strong and there is good medium-term planning to make sure the council stays focused on its priorities. "</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservative <a href="http://cherryhintonroad.blogspot.com/2009/03/folk-festival-report-is-truly-shocking.html" rel="nofollow">Cllr Chris Howell has just published his response to the report</a>; he describes it as &#8220;truly shocking&#8221;. </p>
<p>He draws attention to the fact that prior to the investigation the council had not properly calculated how much it was owed by the ticket selling company. The council&#8217;s losses have been determined to be £644,951, not the £618,000 originally quoted. </p>
<p>He says Cllr Julie Smith, the Executive Councillor responsible, could be described as asleep on the job. </p>
<p>Attention is also drawn to the recent <a href="http://www.cambridge.gov.uk/ccm/content/strategy-and-partnerships/policy-officer/comprehensive-performance-assessment.en" rel="nofollow">Audit Commission&#8217;s statement on Cambridge City Council</a>:<br />
&#8220;Financial management is strong and there is good medium-term planning to make sure the council stays focused on its priorities. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

